Commentary

I do concur!

The war on terror is an ongoing threat that President Obama has been evasive in addressing. Although his intentions may mean well he has not followed through with his original plan to close Guantanamo Bay, rightly so.

An example of this is the trade three detainees that have been proven leaders of Al-Qaeda later to have been traded for one military personnel. This contributed to the usage of prisoners as bargaining pons in Presidents Obama's chess set. The blog presents other examples and accruate data to display that the prisoners of Guantanamo are there for a reason. For that reason, the idea that President Obama has the "good intention" to release those not an affective threat is largely diluted to the threat they may potentionaly make later on. 

Consequently, I could not agree more that "Closing Guantanamo bay is a huge mistake." because of the severity of the crimes and prisoners. I do feel that the original critique is a not haste in saying events that may come from Guantanamo Bay's closing may lead to another 9/11 attack may be possible. We fear what we do not know. 

The original article confirms data on the numbers of prisoners and President Obama's intentions, the article critique confirms the facts and presents the logical view that Guantanamo Bay should not be closed due to future high risk events.

- http://lpusg.blogspot.com